You are here
October 3, 2022
Becoming Beacons of Trust
Strategies for Building Public Health Outreach
By Lenora E. Johnson, DrPH, MPH, Director of the Office of Science Policy, Engagement, Education and Communications in NIH鈥檚 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
When I was a kid, I鈥檇 have little debates with my grandmother about whether something was true or not. She鈥檇 say one thing, and if I suspected she was wrong, I鈥檇 challenge her. 鈥淗ow do you know that?鈥 I鈥檇 ask. And without as much as a blink鈥攃all it a version of the modern-day clapback鈥攕he鈥檇 straighten up, look me in the eyes, and say, 鈥淚 know what I know because I know what I know.鈥
Over time, I realized that what my grandma knew was based on her lived experiences 鈥 at home, around town, at church. She鈥檇 been through enough, seen enough鈥攇ood and bad鈥攖o come to conclusions on her own about what was right or wrong, silly or smart, real or fake. 聽And as an elder in the community, she took seriously her job to pay this hard-earned knowledge forward.
She had become a beacon of trust. 聽
I thought often of my grandmother at the height of the pandemic, when misinformation about COVID-19-related clinical trials and vaccines ran rampant among the very communities鈥攎ostly Black and Brown鈥攖hat needed accurate information most. They were experiencing disproportionately high rates of severe disease and deaths from COVID-19, and their long and familiar history of underlying chronic health conditions only underscored how deeply entrenched the disparities already were.
At NIH, we knew we had to get evidence-based facts and resources to these communities so they would hear truths, consider them against alternative information swirling about, and make informed decisions about mitigation strategies, vaccines and more. But how? As a federal entity, 糖心破解版already seemed removed, suspect. And because of a nationwide dearth of scientists and researchers of color鈥攁 problem we continue to address鈥攆ew of the people standing centerstage to offer guidance looked like the people they were eagerly hoping to enroll in trials and vaccinate. Needless to say, this chasm between community and institution was problematic. Finding a successful way to bridge the divide required something special, something new. And in my mind, it had to start with humility.
What does that look like? I often think of it as entering the home of somebody you don鈥檛 know. You don鈥檛 just run up to the door, barge in and say, 鈥淕uess what I鈥檝e got for you! You need this!鈥 You knock first, then kindly introduce yourself. If you鈥檙e in the South, you鈥檇 probably even need to sit on the porch and drink tea for a while. And even then, you may not immediately get invited in because of a wariness, unspoken and not, that says, 鈥淲hat are you doing here really? Why are you coming to me?鈥
With patience, though, something eventually happens, as my work over the years has borne out. When you begin to show genuine interest or concern about how people are doing in that house, in that neighborhood, in that community, the ones who live there warm up to what you have to offer. But here鈥檚 the key: you can鈥檛 just 鈥渟peak鈥 your interest; you have to show it. You go to meet-and-greets, attend health fairs, church services, schools. You sit, talk, listen, pray.
The point: 鈥渆ntering in鈥 takes time.
For us, it also took the help of a vast cadre of people鈥攏amely, our community partners, the people and organizations we knew had already won the trust of those they served. These were the elders (think my grandma), ministers, teachers, and community workers who could help us translate information into a language, style and format that would be understood, even welcomed.
It also took other people of color whose varied jobs put them along what we call 鈥渢he scientific pathway.鈥 These were the funders, researchers, clinicians, and safety monitors鈥攁ll of whom brought to the mix another level of insight, credibility, and assurance. And their voices resonated. When you hear someone say, 鈥淟ook, I鈥檓 a researcher. I work in this lab. I trust it鈥 鈥and they have a similar lived experience or cultural tradition as you鈥攊t matters. 聽
Finally, it took neighbors and friends who could do some old-school, pound-the-pavement kind of outreach, using door knockers, pamphlets on windshields, and basic canvassing鈥攁ll in good spirit. We call it 鈥渢ranscreating,鈥 focusing on meaning in cultures and communities, or 鈥渃o-creating,鈥 working with communities to realize goals. Suddenly what was old became new again, and in an age of digital overload and confusion, that helped, too.
I guess you could say trust got 鈥渄istributed;鈥 we connected to people with whom we had long-held relationships, and they in turn connected with people who trusted them.
The challenge now is to figure out how to 鈥渆nter in鈥 more often, preferably when a crisis is not at our backs, when all anybody wants to do is to sit together on a big porch, drink tea, listen, and learn.