�����ƽ��

Through 27 Institutes and Centers, each with its own broadly defined mission, �����ƽ��provides leadership and financial support to researchers in every state and throughout the world.

Each year, Federal funds are obligated by Congress for the pursuit of research objectives. Each Institute determines how to allocate its own funds among many different activities of science.

Setting Research Priorities

Decision-makers at �����ƽ��seek advice from many sources when setting research priorities:

• the scientific community, including both individual researchers and professional societies;
• patient organizations and voluntary health associations;
• Institute and Center Advisory Councils;
• the Congress and the Administration;
• the (ACD);
• the ; and
• the �����ƽ��staff.

The �����ƽ��builds its budget by evaluating current opportunities and public health needs while maintaining strong support for investigator-initiated research. The formulation of the provides an established framework within which priorities are identified, reviewed, and justified.

A special office was established dedicated to help manage large and complex research portfolios. The identifies important areas of emerging scientific opportunity or rising public health challenges to assist in the acceleration of research investments in these areas.

Scientific “Peer” Review

Investigator-initiated applications for �����ƽ��funding are evaluated by peer review groups composed of scientists from outside the NIH. The peer review group evaluates the scientific and technical merit of the proposed research. These evaluations are used by the individual Institutes to determine which projects to fund.

The (OER) manages the development and implementation of conducted in all components of the NIH.

Related Links

• — involving multiple Institutes and Centers
• — provides direction and guidance for scientific programs funded by the and develops new resources and tools to support the management and assessment of the �����ƽ��scientific portfolio.
• — advises the �����ƽ��Director on science policy issues affecting the medical research community
• — provides legislative analysis, policy development, and liaison with the Congress
• — serves as the focal point for policies and guidelines for extramural research grants administration
• — responsible for oversight and coordination of intramural research, training, and technology transfer conducted within NIH
• — developing laws, regulations, and policies governing Federal advisory committees
• — enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability of government programs
• — selected reports, budget requests, testimony, and research portfolio.